Author: Chessfun
Date: 12:08:11 10/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2002 at 12:16:46, Ulf Flörsheimer wrote: >> I don't see what everyone is ttalking about tiger 15 is a monster, i haven't >> lost a game with it yet >> >> >Thats right. I've downloaded the full-version and I'm really disappointed. On my >machine (Celeron 533, 256MB-Ram) tiger 15 plays like a toothless old tiger ... >what I couldn't say about tiger 14. > >I have a still older machine (Celeron 333, 64MB-Ram). On this older machine I >let play Fritz7, Ruffian and Nimzo2000 (Original-Version, not >winboard-version)againtst tiger 15 on the stronger machine (Fischer: 5'+30") Tiger don't recognize the inc, ever check the times taken by each program?. Sarah. and >got those results: > >Tiger 15 (Cel.533, 96MB-hash, 4men-egtb) > >- Fritz7 (Cel.333, 32MB-hash, 4men-egtb) 2 - 5 (4 draws) >- Ruffian101 ( " ) 1.5 - 4.5 (3 draws) >- Nimzo 2000 (Cel.333, 32MB-hash) 0.5 - 1.5 > >15 games without one win! > >I can say, that tiger 15 is really no monster on my hardware ... see, whats >happening when Santa C. will bring me a P4 ... ;-))) > >Ulf
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.