Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: chesstiger 15- easy

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 12:51:57 10/03/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 03, 2002 at 05:09:56, John Smith wrote:

>On October 03, 2002 at 04:59:21, Terry Ripple wrote:
>
>>On October 03, 2002 at 04:27:27, John Smith wrote:
>>
>>>I don't mean to start a troll, and I do realize that you need hundreds of games
>>>to make any significant mathematical statement as to the relative strength of
>>>any particular program.  That being said, I have to agree with some posts that
>>>state that tiger 15 is weak.
>>>
>>>In my particular case, yahoo advance lounge, after approximately 100 games, I
>>>find that ct15 normal to be more passive than either tiger 14 and certainly
>>>gambit 2.  My record is worse with respect to identical opponents then with
>>>tiger 14 or gambit2.
>>>
>>>I was wondering if perhaps there is a bug with the downloaded upgrade which
>>>somehow degrades performance compared to a CD installed program.
>>>
>>>Just my 2 cents.
>>>
>>>The one area where it has improved tremendously is in the endgame.
>>---------------
>>There must be something wrong with your setup because how do you explain all the
>>games that Chessfun recently presented showing Tiger 15 #1!!!
>>
>>Regards,
>>      Terry
>
>
>Maybe she had the full upgrade; I only purchased the cheap ($29) upgrade from
>Lex.  Or maybe she had the full CD with opening book.  Who knows.
>
>My setup, btw is AMD 2100xp (1533 overclocked to 1793mhz),512 mb ram 2700, and I
>set hash to 192mb; all other settings to tiger 15 normal are default.
>
>In other games, it seems that tiger 15 gambit aggressive is stronger than
>normal.  However, I havent played enough games to make any definitive statement.

Well some good news the result from Tiger15 Gambit agressive style versus
Rufian1.00
Already went from 0-3 to 3-3
I have not used the swap file for the gambit book yet
Maybe others with bad results did (Just guesing).
But I still can't give my defenitive standpoint
I actualy also think *apoligyses where yesterday on it's place
But again I was verry disapointed.
I now only will  give my revieuw when I realy have made up my statement.
 Marc
* Don't know if I got it right there.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.