Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 13:20:03 10/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2002 at 15:52:34, Peter Berger wrote: >When it is about those $20,000 - isn't it more logical to conclude that >administration of Unix boxes is simply more difficult so that you need more >knowledge? Unix/linux/bsd requires more knowledge, without question. So does flying a fighter jet compared to a crop dusting plane. >Have you red/heard about the N1 vision of Sun Microsystems? No, could you give us the general idea? >there >are a lot of efforts to make it easier to save those 20,000. I don't see how that's going to save anyone money. Pay a few dozen guys an extra $20,000 a year, and save a few million that you don't have to pay Microsoft. Seems like using linux comes out ahead, big time. >But with .NET this might >very well change. .NET may or may not work out. It's success would seem to be dependant upon the decision of other vendors to support it, which wouldn't exactly be in their best interests. That being the case, I don't think it will be any more successful than Visual Basic. Russell
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.