Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Completely blocked positions, some interesting things

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 01:10:01 10/04/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 03, 2002 at 19:39:27, Omid David wrote:

>On October 03, 2002 at 19:18:16, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>
>>8/7p/6pP/k4pP1/b1p1pP2/KpPpP3/1P1P4/7Q w - - 0 1
>>3k4/2p1p1p1/p1P1P1Pp/P6P/4K3/8/8/8 w
>>8/4kr1b/4p3/rp1pPp1p/pPpP1PpP/P1P3P1/2K5/8 w
>>8/4k3/8/p1p1p1p1/P1P1P1P1/8/2B1K3/8 w
>>4b3/4k3/2p1p1p1/1pPpPpPp/pP1P1P1P/P2K4/3B4/8 w - - 0 1
>>3B4/1r2p3/r2p1p2/bkp1P1p1/1p1P1PPp/p1P1K2P/PPB5/8 w - - 0 1
>>4k3/8/1p1p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/5P1P/2BB4/K7 w
>>
>>
>>This is a set of positions that most chess programs completely don't understand
>>because the position is completely blocked.  I have implemented some ability in
>>Crafty to understand this type of position, with decent results.  There are also
>>a couple of interesting problems that have come up, particularly with the last
>>position.
>>
>>[D]8/7p/6pP/k4pP1/b1p1pP2/KpPpP3/1P1P4/7Q w - - 0 1
>>
>>Static evaluation is now 0 here.  The solution is supposed to be Qd1 <bishop
>>move> {Kb5 Qh5!} Qxb3.  The problem in solving this is that the evaluation after
>>the given line is negative for white, so it doesn't want to play the
>>'sacrifice'.  But I consider it a good result that it knows this is a draw since
>>it can't make progress.
>>Normal Crafty 18.15 says near +5, while making the wrong move.
>>
>>[D]3k4/2p1p1p1/p1P1P1Pp/P6P/4K3/8/8/8 w
>>
>>Static evaluation 0, search returns instant 60 plies with drawscore.
>>Normal Crafty says +1.4 or so.
>>
>>[D]8/4kr1b/4p3/rp1pPp1p/pPpP1PpP/P1P3P1/2K5/8 w
>>
>>Static 0 again, search says the same.
>>Normal crafty has static score near -13, and wants to open the position, search
>>score keeps dropping.
>>
>>[D]8/4k3/8/p1p1p1p1/P1P1P1P1/8/2B1K3/8 w
>>
>>Drawscore, static and by 60 ply search.
>>Normal Crafty gives +3.3 for both.
>>
>>[D]4b3/4k3/2p1p1p1/1pPpPpPp/pP1P1P1P/P2K4/3B4/8 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Static score 0, instant 60 plies.
>>Normal Crafty is similar, +0.09/+0.06
>>
>>[D]3B4/1r2p3/r2p1p2/bkp1P1p1/1p1P1PPp/p1P1K2P/PPB5/8 w - - 0 1
>>
>>Static evaluation of -5.93 here, but it finds the draw by search in 6 plies.
>>Normal Crafty says -6.07, and wants to open the position by search, with
>>dropping score.
>>
>>[D]4k3/8/1p1p4/pPpPp1p1/P1P1PpPp/5P1P/2BB4/K7 w
>>
>>This is the first problem position.  It is evaluated statically as a draw, but
>>once White sacrifices its dark-squared bishop for one of black's pawns, it no
>>longer gets evaluated as a draw.  No problem, right?  Well, it keeps pushing it
>>back into the horizon:
>>
>>   6     0.01   6.39   1. Bxa5 bxa5 2. Kb2 Ke7 3. Kc3 Kd7
>>   6->   0.02   6.39   1. Bxa5 bxa5 2. Kb2 Ke7 3. Kc3 Kd7
>>   7     0.02   6.50   1. Bxa5 bxa5 2. Kb2 Ke7 3. Kc3 Kd7
>>                       4. Kd3
>>   7->   0.03   6.50   1. Bxa5 bxa5 2. Kb2 Ke7 3. Kc3 Kd7
>>                       4. Kd3
>>   8     0.03     --   1. Bxa5
>>   8     0.03   0.00   1. Bxa5 bxa5 2. Kb2 Kd7 3. Bb3 Kc7
>>                       4. Kc3 Kb6
>>   8     0.04   6.39   1. Ka2 Kd7 2. Kb2 Kc7 3. Bc3 Kb7 4.
>>                       Bxe5 dxe5
>>   8     0.05   6.50   1. Kb2 Kd7 2. Kc3 Kc7 3. Kd3 Kd7 4.
>>                       Bxa5 bxa5 <HT>
>>   8->   0.05   6.50   1. Kb2 Kd7 2. Kc3 Kc7 3. Kd3 Kd7 4.
>>                       Bxa5 bxa5 <HT>
>>   .......................................................
>>  19     2.69   6.56   1. Kb2 Kd7 2. Kc3 Kc7 3. Kd3 Kd7 4.
>>                       Bc3 Ke7 5. Bb3 Kd7 6. Be1 Kc7 7. Ba2
>>                       Kd7 8. Bc3 Ke7 9. Bxe5 dxe5 10. Bb3
>>  19->   3.05   6.56   1. Kb2 Kd7 2. Kc3 Kc7 3. Kd3 Kd7 4.
>>                       Bc3 Ke7 5. Bb3 Kd7 6. Be1 Kc7 7. Ba2
>>                       Kd7 8. Bc3 Ke7 9. Bxe5 dxe5 10. Bb3
>>
>>No matter how deep I let it go, it always pushes the bishop sac into the last
>>couple of plies.  Is there any way I can solve this problem?
>>Normal Crafty here says 7.77 static, and it doesn't have any captures in the
>>search as long as it goes, score stays around 8.26.
>>
>>Does anyone have more positions they'd like me to try, or has anyone else worked
>>on this kind of thing in their engine?
>
>
>My under-development engine, detects the positions you mentioned as draw based
>on static evaluation (seems that you have done something similar).

I think that you did something better.

Based on positions that wereposted here in the past you do not need all the
pawns to be blocked to detect a draw.
The only question is if there are cases when your draw detection can be wrong.

If it cannot be wrong then I think that doing it only when the remaining depth
is big enough can be an advantage.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.