Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>>

Author: Terry Ripple

Date: 03:23:12 10/04/02

This is quite an interesting statement from the Fritz team!

  Friedel(Fritz operator) explained that while Deep Blue searched 200 million
positions per second compared to Deep Fritz's 3-4 million, much of Deep Blue's
parallel searching was wasted as many of its dozens of chips were looking at the
same thing. "Another important difference is that Deep Fritz is a commercial
product while Deep Blue was running on a supercomputer and 15 million dollars
were invested by IBM in the project. But Fritz is definitely not weaker than
Deep Blue," he concluded.

Regards,
      Terry

Re: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>> Robert Hyatt 07:50:15 10/04/02
Re: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>> Uri Blass 03:44:58 10/04/02
Re: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>> José Carlos 03:39:38 10/04/02
- Re: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>> Uri Blass 03:53:03 10/04/02
  - Re: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>> José Carlos 04:00:04 10/04/02
  - Re: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>> Gian-Carlo Pascutto 03:55:44 10/04/02
    - Re: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>> Vincent Diepeveen 08:08:05 10/04/02
    - Re: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>> Shep 05:18:19 10/04/02
      - Re: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>> Uri Blass 06:37:34 10/04/02
        
        Re: Much of Deep Blue's parallel searching was wasted >>> Vincent Diepeveen 08:09:16 10/04/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.