Author: José Carlos
Date: 04:00:04 10/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2002 at 06:53:03, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 04, 2002 at 06:39:38, José Carlos wrote: > >>On October 04, 2002 at 06:23:12, Terry Ripple wrote: >> >>>This is quite an interesting statement from the Fritz team! >>> >>> Friedel(Fritz operator) explained that while Deep Blue searched 200 million >>>positions per second compared to Deep Fritz's 3-4 million, much of Deep Blue's >>>parallel searching was wasted as many of its dozens of chips were looking at the >>>same thing. "Another important difference is that Deep Fritz is a commercial >>>product while Deep Blue was running on a supercomputer and 15 million dollars >>>were invested by IBM in the project. But Fritz is definitely not weaker than >>>Deep Blue," he concluded. >>> >>>Regards, >>> Terry >> >> Surprising. >> I would expect from Fritz team something like: "Deep Blue was great. >>Fritz is much slower and thus much weaker, and our parallel search is >>poorly implemented. If Kramnik loses that'll be pathetic". :) >> >> José C. > >Why do you expect it? Look at the smily at the end of my sentence. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.