Author: Chessfun
Date: 05:07:25 10/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2002 at 15:51:57, Marc van Hal wrote: >On October 03, 2002 at 05:09:56, John Smith wrote: > >>On October 03, 2002 at 04:59:21, Terry Ripple wrote: >> >>>On October 03, 2002 at 04:27:27, John Smith wrote: >>> >>>>I don't mean to start a troll, and I do realize that you need hundreds of games >>>>to make any significant mathematical statement as to the relative strength of >>>>any particular program. That being said, I have to agree with some posts that >>>>state that tiger 15 is weak. >>>> >>>>In my particular case, yahoo advance lounge, after approximately 100 games, I >>>>find that ct15 normal to be more passive than either tiger 14 and certainly >>>>gambit 2. My record is worse with respect to identical opponents then with >>>>tiger 14 or gambit2. >>>> >>>>I was wondering if perhaps there is a bug with the downloaded upgrade which >>>>somehow degrades performance compared to a CD installed program. >>>> >>>>Just my 2 cents. >>>> >>>>The one area where it has improved tremendously is in the endgame. >>>--------------- >>>There must be something wrong with your setup because how do you explain all the >>>games that Chessfun recently presented showing Tiger 15 #1!!! >>> >>>Regards, >>> Terry >> >> >>Maybe she had the full upgrade; I only purchased the cheap ($29) upgrade from >>Lex. Or maybe she had the full CD with opening book. Who knows. >> >>My setup, btw is AMD 2100xp (1533 overclocked to 1793mhz),512 mb ram 2700, and I >>set hash to 192mb; all other settings to tiger 15 normal are default. >> >>In other games, it seems that tiger 15 gambit aggressive is stronger than >>normal. However, I havent played enough games to make any definitive statement. > >Well some good news the result from Tiger15 Gambit agressive style versus >Rufian1.00 >Already went from 0-3 to 3-3 >I have not used the swap file for the gambit book yet >Maybe others with bad results did (Just guesing). AFAIK the old Gambit.tbk wasn't designed to work with Tiger 15. It was designed to work with Gambit Tiger 2.0. However although using swap.bat will change the name of the books and it appears that the gambit.tbk renamed ct.tbk works the book moves will not display in the book window. Sarah. >But I still can't give my defenitive standpoint >I actualy also think *apoligyses where yesterday on it's place >But again I was verry disapointed. >I now only will give my revieuw when I realy have made up my statement. > Marc >* Don't know if I got it right there.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.