Author: Lex Loep
Date: 06:38:57 10/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2002 at 08:07:25, Chessfun wrote: >On October 03, 2002 at 15:51:57, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>On October 03, 2002 at 05:09:56, John Smith wrote: >> >>>On October 03, 2002 at 04:59:21, Terry Ripple wrote: >>> >>>>On October 03, 2002 at 04:27:27, John Smith wrote: >>>> >>>>>I don't mean to start a troll, and I do realize that you need hundreds of games >>>>>to make any significant mathematical statement as to the relative strength of >>>>>any particular program. That being said, I have to agree with some posts that >>>>>state that tiger 15 is weak. >>>>> >>>>>In my particular case, yahoo advance lounge, after approximately 100 games, I >>>>>find that ct15 normal to be more passive than either tiger 14 and certainly >>>>>gambit 2. My record is worse with respect to identical opponents then with >>>>>tiger 14 or gambit2. >>>>> >>>>>I was wondering if perhaps there is a bug with the downloaded upgrade which >>>>>somehow degrades performance compared to a CD installed program. >>>>> >>>>>Just my 2 cents. >>>>> >>>>>The one area where it has improved tremendously is in the endgame. >>>>--------------- >>>>There must be something wrong with your setup because how do you explain all the >>>>games that Chessfun recently presented showing Tiger 15 #1!!! >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>> Terry >>> >>> >>>Maybe she had the full upgrade; I only purchased the cheap ($29) upgrade from >>>Lex. Or maybe she had the full CD with opening book. Who knows. >>> >>>My setup, btw is AMD 2100xp (1533 overclocked to 1793mhz),512 mb ram 2700, and I >>>set hash to 192mb; all other settings to tiger 15 normal are default. >>> >>>In other games, it seems that tiger 15 gambit aggressive is stronger than >>>normal. However, I havent played enough games to make any definitive statement. >> >>Well some good news the result from Tiger15 Gambit agressive style versus >>Rufian1.00 >>Already went from 0-3 to 3-3 >>I have not used the swap file for the gambit book yet >>Maybe others with bad results did (Just guesing). > > >AFAIK the old Gambit.tbk wasn't designed to work with Tiger 15. It was designed >to work with Gambit Tiger 2.0. > thats right the Tiger 14 .tbk books don't work with Tiger 15. The book format is not compatible so it simply wont work. Lex >However although using swap.bat will change the name of the books and it appears >that the gambit.tbk renamed ct.tbk works the book moves will not display in the >book window. > >Sarah. > > >>But I still can't give my defenitive standpoint >>I actualy also think *apoligyses where yesterday on it's place >>But again I was verry disapointed. >>I now only will give my revieuw when I realy have made up my statement. >> Marc >>* Don't know if I got it right there.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.