Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:50:15 10/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2002 at 06:23:12, Terry Ripple wrote: >This is quite an interesting statement from the Fritz team! > > Friedel(Fritz operator) explained that while Deep Blue searched 200 million >positions per second compared to Deep Fritz's 3-4 million, much of Deep Blue's >parallel searching was wasted as many of its dozens of chips were looking at the >same thing. "Another important difference is that Deep Fritz is a commercial >product while Deep Blue was running on a supercomputer and 15 million dollars >were invested by IBM in the project. But Fritz is definitely not weaker than >Deep Blue," he concluded. > >Regards, > Terry Frederick is the same person that advised Kasparov that practicing against Fritz but giving it a longer time to search would be equivalent to playing against deep blue. He's _not_ a computer chess expert. He is _far_ from a parallel search expert. _any_ program does extra work when searching a tree in parallel. Including, of all things, deep fritz. take the comparison with a big grain of salt...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.