Author: Omid David
Date: 08:48:06 10/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2002 at 11:34:39, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 04, 2002 at 11:26:51, Omid David wrote: > >slowing down the search is not the problem. the problem i >explained in email to sargon So I assume the problem is that it's not 100% reliable, and may return inaccurate estimates. Right? > >>On October 04, 2002 at 11:22:05, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On October 04, 2002 at 10:34:43, Omid David wrote: >>> >>>had fritz implemented such a scheme it would play 300 points weaker >>>anyway. >> >>It depends on how you implement it without slowing down the search >>significantly, and that's what I'm currently working on... >> >>It's obvious that applying the whole heuristic on each and every node is too >>expensive. But a wise application of it, could detect many draws without any >>significant impact on the total speed. >> >>Omid. >> >> >>> >>>>Just today we had a discussion regarding the importance of blockade draw >>>>detections http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?255950 >>>> >>>>Had Fritz implemented such a scheme, it wouldn't have stepped into the drawing >>>>variation. >>>> >>>>My engine instantly announced draw based on its blocked-draw detection >>>>heuristic. While Fritz never realized the draw... >>>> >>>>Omid.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.