Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 08:49:41 10/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2002 at 11:17:50, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 02, 2002 at 23:15:45, Terry Ripple wrote: > >Let's compare real ratings instead of the inflated USCF ratings. >Let's take the ONLY international rating list there is on this >entire planet: FIDE rating. > >Larry's FIDE rating is about 2550 now which means he's an average GM >to european standards, definitely not even close to world top 100, >where you need >= 2600 for. > >In fact i just drew a real 2600+ GM: > >GM jeroen piket (2646 FIDE, that's about 2900 uscf to compare). ----------------------------- This is wrong because there is not a 254 point difference between USCF and FIDE and if fact there is little difference between the two in high rated GM's. Sune showed here that the point difference varied from about 60 to 100 points on average but only a few were as high as 131 points difference! Larry's FIDE rating is very close to 2600! Larry is #16 in the USA! This does not show a weak player to me and if you still think so, then why don't you go on WCN to play him on their Grandmaster Challenge to see if you can get even one win from him, i doubt it very much! Terry > >I was basically reacting onto the stupid statement of some that >the level of 2 120 was a good one. it's a very idiotic level. All his >life in big tournaments Larry has played 40 in 2. > >Now he gets paid to not win and quicker level. it's not realistic to >say he plays world top then. Instead he plays like an IM then. Who >wouldn't? > >Sure he was a big player a few years ago, but you must be realistic now. >Age is very important in sports, also in chess! > >>Larry Christiansen was higher rated in the past, but now his USCF Rating taken >>from August 2002 issue is "2642". He is still very active and winning his share >>of games with 2600 players and some even stronger! >> >>He plays 25 minute games several times a week on world Chess Network against >>many Grandmasters and wins quite his share of games! (18.5 to 7.5) >> >>Your Statement Vince: saying he plays better with 2 minutes a move than with 3 >>minute a move is the most idiotic statement ever done. >> >>I never commented about 3 minutes a move being better than 2 minutes a move. >>Larry stated that the time control he played (2minutes + 120 seconds per move) >>seemed to benifit him better than the time control 30 moves in 60 minutes that >>was originaly agreed upon. The only reason this time control wasn't used was >>because ICC don't use this type of time control on their site! >> >>Tomorrow i will present you with a list of all the Grandmasters that Larry - >>Christiansen won in 25 minute games over the last 2 months! > >Blundercheck those games too will you, to see what his score would be >against computers there. I bet closer to 0% than to 50% > >>He has an incredible score of 18.5 points out of a total of 26 games!! This >>don't sound like a weak player to me! > >He is getting weak now, really. > >>Regards, >> Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.