Author: Omid David
Date: 08:53:09 10/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 04, 2002 at 11:47:34, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 04, 2002 at 11:44:02, Omid David wrote: > >>On October 04, 2002 at 11:41:49, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On October 04, 2002 at 11:38:18, Omid David wrote: >>> >>>>At the current stage, my engine has a +2500 performance, so I know what I'm >>>>talking about. >>> >>>Compared to what? Elo only has meaning in a context. I can make >>>ELOstat produce rating lists that rank my engine as +3600. That >>>doesn't mean it has any meaning. >> >>Based on the games it has played against other engines. I don't calculate with >>EloStat or any such thing. > >How did you calibrate the ratings of the other engines? > Aren't the ratings of top commercial and free chess engines pretty clear? By playing games against these programs, you get a realistic estimate of your engine's rating, don't you? I can't be sure that my program is weaker or stronger than engine X or Y, and frankly I don't care at the moment. I have still 1 year, 1 months, and 19 days left to work on it ;-) >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.