Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:01:22 10/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2002 at 15:08:11, Chessfun wrote:
>On October 03, 2002 at 12:16:46, Ulf Flörsheimer wrote:
>
>>> I don't see what everyone is ttalking about tiger 15 is a monster, i haven't
>>> lost a game with it yet
>>>
>>>
>>Thats right. I've downloaded the full-version and I'm really disappointed. On my
>>machine (Celeron 533, 256MB-Ram) tiger 15 plays like a toothless old tiger ...
>>what I couldn't say about tiger 14.
>>
>>I have a still older machine (Celeron 333, 64MB-Ram). On this older machine I
>>let play Fritz7, Ruffian and Nimzo2000 (Original-Version, not
>>winboard-version)againtst tiger 15 on the stronger machine (Fischer: 5'+30")
>
>
>Tiger don't recognize the inc, ever check the times taken by each program?.
>
>Sarah.
>
>
>
>and
>>got those results:
>>
>>Tiger 15 (Cel.533, 96MB-hash, 4men-egtb)
>>
>>- Fritz7 (Cel.333, 32MB-hash, 4men-egtb) 2 - 5 (4 draws)
>>- Ruffian101 ( " ) 1.5 - 4.5 (3 draws)
>>- Nimzo 2000 (Cel.333, 32MB-hash) 0.5 - 1.5
>>
>>15 games without one win!
>>
>>I can say, that tiger 15 is really no monster on my hardware ... see, whats
>>happening when Santa C. will bring me a P4 ... ;-)))
>>
>>Ulf
Tiger 15 still has a problem with Fischer time controls.
When you set it to 5+30 it will probably use only 10 seconds or so per move,
instead of 35 seconds in average.
So you let it play with a 3/1 handicap... Not surprising that it has problems.
Frankly I don't understand why someone would use a Fischer time control of X+Y
where Y is much bigger than X. Can someone explain the idea behind this?
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.