Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: test position DF7 vs GM Kramnik

Author: Terry Ripple

Date: 09:01:54 10/04/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 04, 2002 at 11:52:32, K. Burcham wrote:

>
>
>Thats because your processor is not looking near as far into the position like a
>multiprocessor! They was some talk about this posititon and that it was still a
>draw and Deep Fritz's evaluation maybe gave a slightly better for the move it
>made.
>
>Terry
>
>
>I do not believe that their 8x900, 7200mhz had greater depth than
>2x1533mhz 432 hash analyzing this move for 19:25 minutes. I will analyze longer
>to check this.
>
>25.f4 hxg4 26.hxg4 Bh4 27.Kf1 c6 28.Ke2 Kd7 29.Bd2 Ke8 30.Be1
>>  ±  (0.88)   Depth: 25/50   00:19:25  1655996kN, tb=470
>
>kburcham
-------------
I agree that f4 is the much better move and actually GM Larry Christiansen
stated several moves before this that it would be a good plan for white!

Do you have any idea why Deep Fritz made the different choice?

Terry



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.