Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:37:40 10/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 03, 2002 at 21:57:57, john rice wrote:
>Remember Thorsten, Chessfun's results were generated from 40/40 games. Faster
>(and more common?) games like 10/10 could change the results dramatically. Some
>posters have already indicated they have achieved less than stellar results on
>Yahoo's advance chess lounge playing blitz games with CT15. Despite these mixed
>reviews, I just ordered it and am looking forward to testing it myself.
>
>On October 03, 2002 at 19:58:01, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>On October 03, 2002 at 19:39:19, Tim OConnor wrote:
>>
>>>What would I find?
>>
>>the results chessfun has posted.
I can tell you that CT15 is not afraid of the fastest time controls.
Do not forget that I keep a close eye to the results of the engine on very slow
hardware like the Palm (68000 @33MHz).
The engine is designed and developped to perform optimally at any time control
on any kind of hardware (at least hardware that is currently in use, from the
fastest PC to the slowest Palm).
I KNOW Chess Tiger 15 performs as well at fast time controls as at long time
controls. I have worked a lot to achieve this result.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.