Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:11:12 10/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2002 at 05:11:40, Tony Werten wrote: >On October 06, 2002 at 03:35:28, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 05, 2002 at 17:37:08, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On October 05, 2002 at 17:34:53, Peter Berger wrote: >>> >>>>This one takes Yace running in the background on P4 2200 about 90 seconds to >see there is a problem, and it needs ply 21. >>>>Getting this with static eval sounds risky - what should the rule be? >>> >>>Considering that this kind of positions seems to occur rather frequently, >>>I'm thinking of: 'assume all pawn endgames are lost' ;) >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>It means that you are going to miss win by trading to a pawn endgame. >>I do not think that these kind of positions occur rather frequently. > >What a lot of people seem to forget is that with 1M nodes/sec any strange >position will occur quite often in search. > >Tony It may appear in the search but usually it is not going to be relevant because 99.9% of the lines in the search are irrelevant. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.