Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 13:06:04 10/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2002 at 21:05:41, stuart taylor wrote: >If the human (i.e. Kramnik or Kasparov) were forced to play complex tactical >positions against these versions and setups of DFritz, and soon DJunior, would >the Kramnik or Kasparov then be overpowered? If so, this is very serious! > And anyway, what's the whole point in playing champ vs. Comp? I would say to >see if Computer can beat human champ in positions in which computers are good >at. > Look, If you give a human a hammer and the computer a hammer, the human can >easly smash the computer. That does not prove very much. >S.Taylor In very complex (but equal) tactical positions and given limited time, yes, I think the best programs would beat the best GMs a majority of the time. Conversely, in quiet, equal positions (but not so quiet that there are not real winning chances), most GMs would beat the best programs most of the time. IMHO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.