Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Human flexibility versus computers

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 13:35:36 10/06/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 06, 2002 at 16:26:17, Ingo Althofer wrote:

>In game 2 against program Fritz GM Kramnik has impressively shown how humans can
>adopt to computer opponents and how helpful such flexibility is. I am firmly
>convinced that Kramnik had this opening on the board in his preparation, and
>that 9.Kf1 was fully intended to throw Fritz out of its book. And very likely
>Kramnik had already seen Fritz' dubious moves 12...Bf8 and 13...b4 on the
>monitor in his camp before the match. (Remember: Kramnik had the current Fritz
>version already a long time for sparring purposes.)
>By the way: Bf8 was not an isolated Fritz blunder but was also for instance on a
>narrow rank 2 in the proposals of Hiarcs...
>
>Some spectators may now have the feeling that Kramnik's dry style makes the
>match less interesting. But
>
>(i) The more dry Kramnik is acting now the more fireworks we will see from
>Kasparov in December. In his hot temper Kasparov will try to demonstrate how
>superior his chess is to that of Kramnik. So, have some patience.
>
>(ii) From my very personal view the games from Bahrain show the superiority of
>human+computer teams over single computers, even if the human is only an amateur
>player. No Elo-2000 player would have selected 12... Bf8 amongst a set of for
>instance three similarily evaluated candidate moves; and most Elo-2000 players
>would have prefered a candidate move like 13...Bd5 over the wrong pawn fixing
>13...b4.
>
>Ingo Althofer.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.