Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:43:19 10/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2002 at 18:34:32, chris sergel wrote: >we know that. >This seems like a mis-match. >If Fritz plays against another Berlin, then for sure this is a mis-match. >Some of the moves played by Fritz were so weak. How could Fritz play such moves >with 8 processors? Frankly I think that Tiger or Hiarcs might have given >Kramnik a better contest. I do not think that fritz played so bad. I also do not think that Tiger or Hiarcs could do better when Kramnik gets the program before the game. They also do stupid mistakes that kramnik may take adantage of them. It seems that some people expect too much from Fritz. I think that 25% against kramnik is an excellent result for Fritz when kramnik gets the machine before the game. Fritz in the Israeli league could not even get a performance of 2500 and I suspect that the opponents did less preperation than kramnik(inspite of the fact that the teams could choose the opponent to play against the computer). Fritz did not use more than one processor in the Israeli league but more processors+better software can give at most 100-200 elo and the preperation of kramnik is reducing it to 0-100 elo. It means that performance of 2600 against kramnik is excellent for Fritz Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.