Author: Omid David
Date: 16:41:24 10/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2002 at 18:43:19, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 06, 2002 at 18:34:32, chris sergel wrote: > >>we know that. >>This seems like a mis-match. >>If Fritz plays against another Berlin, then for sure this is a mis-match. >>Some of the moves played by Fritz were so weak. How could Fritz play such moves >>with 8 processors? Frankly I think that Tiger or Hiarcs might have given >>Kramnik a better contest. > >I do not think that fritz played so bad. >I also do not think that Tiger or Hiarcs could do better when Kramnik gets the >program before the game. > >They also do stupid mistakes that kramnik may take adantage of them. Just an example: It seems that Fritz's worst mistake was Bf8. Testing that position on other engines, most of them also consider Bf8 to be a good move, putting it as their second best, or third best options. >It seems that some people expect too much from Fritz. > >I think that 25% against kramnik is an excellent result for Fritz when kramnik >gets the machine before the game. > >Fritz in the Israeli league could not even get a performance of 2500 and >I suspect that the opponents did less preperation than kramnik(inspite of the >fact that the teams could choose the opponent to play against the computer). > > >Fritz did not use more than one processor in the Israeli league but more >processors+better software can give at most 100-200 elo and the preperation of >kramnik is reducing it to 0-100 elo. > >It means that performance of 2600 against kramnik is excellent for Fritz > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.