Author: Chessfun
Date: 20:12:43 10/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2002 at 22:41:50, Thorsten Czub wrote: >How many professionals participated in france ??? > >:-)))) > >how big are the chances to be better than amateurs >when the only professional is tiger ?? > >tiger 15 is weaker in tournaments because it plays more acurate >(petrosian alike) than other tiger versions. > >this playing style is not good for tournaments. it is on the >other hand better for long matches. > >for championships it would IMO be better to participate >with an aggressive program that shortly after the opening >takes over initiative. > > >but : you "told us so". > >why do we test programs anyway ? >maybe it would be much easier to ask you before, and >write a religious speech about in CCC :-))) > >we sell our PC's, and become a member of your relgion :-)) > >the style of tiger versions has changed IMO >very often: > >tiger 11.2 was IMO agressive attacker, took the initiative soon >tiger 12 was petrosian, calm and positional player >tiger 13 aggressive >tiger 14 aggressive >tiger 15 more like petrosian with a piece of fischer IMO > > >I do prefer the more aggressive programs too. > >with a passive program, you can be lucky to get a draw (in ONE game). >thats not enough for a tournament . > >in a tournament you must collect as much points as you can get. >a draw is not enough. > >so passive style leads to losses. CPU utilisé par chaque programme : Time control 20/5? 1. Chess Wizard Ath 1750 2. Pharon Ath 2000 3. Chinito Ath 1530 4. Dragon Ath 1600+ 5. Chess Tiger PIII 1 ghz. Why would Tiger be sent to play on this hardware? Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.