Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: help chesstiger 15

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 00:14:34 10/07/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 06, 2002 at 18:54:07, Dieter Buerssner wrote:

>On October 06, 2002 at 16:16:19, Sune Fischer wrote:
>
>>On October 06, 2002 at 14:47:20, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>So it is better to have the GUI play half the game for the engine?
>
>This has nothing to do with the protocol issue. Have you read the UCI
>documentation?

I have read a small help file of about 600 kB.

>Also with the WB protocol, the GUI could play half of the game
>for the engine. Even if it does so (for example, because the user wants to use
>the book he wants, and not the book the engine author decided to use) I see no
>real problem. I see one problem in the case of TB-positions, where for example
>the CB-GUIs can spoil a win to a draw because of uncomplete TBs, when the engine
>alone would easyily win it. But again, not a matter of protocol at all.

You are right, the engine can ask for the book to be turned off.
I'd hate to see it spoil a win because of incomplete TBs though!

>>Where is the excitement in that?
>>I've also heard there are problems with learning! That alone is reason enough to
>>reject the protocol, from my viewpoint.
>
>Indeed, learning was/is a problem (at least for me) under UCI.
>
>>Last but not least, the engine is running in force mode, this means you either
>>need a new (simpler) protocol for when playing in the console, or you will have
>>to put up with writing "go" at every move...
>>Somehow that doesn't sound very professional or "clean" to me either.
>
>?
>
>Very strange comment from someone, who seemed to have quite some problems to
>understand the WB-protocol, and why sometimes a go is not needed. I personally
>see no problem in all those goes, and think it is much cleaner.

I think the WB protocol could use a better documentation, but once I "got the
idea" I kindof like it. It is hard to get the idea just from reading how each
command should behave.

-S.

>Other points are certainly debatable.
>
>Regards,
>Dieter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.