Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 02:06:17 10/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2002 at 03:32:27, Jouni Uski wrote: >Just reminder, that there is update in http://wlotzka.bei.t-online.de. > >1.Fritz 7 06.09.2002 2734 >2 Chess Tiger 14.0 23.03.2001 2670 >3 Shredder 6 21.11.2001 (D)2642 >4 Hiarcs 8 05.04.2002 (GB) 2628 >5 The King 3.12c 05.07.2001 (NL) 2616 >6 Ruffian 1.0.0 23.09.2002 (SWE) 2592 >7 Junior 7 29.05.2001 (ISR) 2576 >8 Gandalf 4.32h 23.11.2000 (DK) 2555 >9 Nimzo 8 22.09.2000 (A) 2546 >10 Crafty 18.13 11.01.2002 (USA) 2529 >11 Yace 0.99.56 25.09.2001 (D) 2515 >12 Little Goliath 2000 v3.6 07.05.2002 2498 >13 Aristarch 4.4 02.08.2002 (D) 2493 >14 SOS.2 for Arena 23.03.2002 (D) 2488 >15 Tao 5.4 05.08.2002 (NL) 2480 >16 Pharaon 2.62 20.01.2002 (D) 2477 >17 Ikarus V0.18 05.04.2000 (D) 2460 >18 LambChop 10.88 05.05.2001 (NZ) 2448 > >This is based to 340 games... > >May be Ruffian should play Kramnik and not Junior?! > >Jouni Apart from the fact that it's not Junior who's playing against Kramnik but Fritz, I think the lesson of the first two games in the Kramnik-DF match should be, that it's not really important which chess engine plays. And with how many hashtables and CPUs and whatnot. As long as we (and the chess programmers) hold on to things like NPS and stuff, the human will always have a chance. Yeah, so other engines might not have made the move Bf8, (although apparently some also would have) but then, Kramnik would just smash them in another way. ;) Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.