Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 03:58:28 10/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2002 at 06:13:29, Janosch Zwerensky wrote: > >>There is a difference. The short castle was impossible after Bf8. > >Ok, so from move 13 to move 15 DF could not have castled. And this helped >Kramnik exactly _how_? You mean if the difference was of importance for the later development? Well, I would say that FRITZ had a better game with castling and direct centralizing of his Rooks too. But beyond that, I'm not arguing for the blunder as the main reason for the loss in this game. Fritz lost because Kramnik has well understood the limits of the machine. And then he has all the equipment to handle properly necessary technique problems. The Bf8 has more a symbolic value as such. Please read my explanation in Computer chess & Fairy tales about *Chess*. Rolf Tueschen > >Regards, >Janosch
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.