Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Ruffian BETTER than CT15 at Stand: wrong - you played blitz games

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 06:39:42 10/07/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 07, 2002 at 08:48:04, Rex wrote:

>I DO not agree. Ruffian is MUCH stronger at longer time controls.  Running
>against CT 15 NORMAL I play 10 games at 120/0.  1.533Ghz with ponder off each
>running 196Meg of ram using default books.


look. i am playing 40/120 games at 2 machines (1200 mhz) with ponder ON and
ruffian is NOT stronger than CT15.

• Re: Ruffian BETTER than CT15 at Stand: wrong - you played blitz games Uri Blass 07:05:39 10/07/02
  • Re: Ruffian BETTER than CT15 at Stand: wrong - you played blitz games Thorsten Czub 07:42:16 10/07/02
  • Re: Ruffian BETTER than CT15 at Stand: wrong - you played blitz games Rex 07:29:40 10/07/02
    • Re: Ruffian BETTER than CT15 at Stand: wrong - you played blitz games Chessfun 07:48:36 10/07/02
  • Re: Ruffian BETTER than CT15 at Stand: wrong - you played blitz games Rex 07:18:12 10/07/02
  • Re: Ruffian BETTER than CT15 at Stand: wrong - you played blitz games Kurt Utzinger 07:11:39 10/07/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.