Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:05:39 10/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2002 at 09:39:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 07, 2002 at 08:48:04, Rex wrote: > >>I DO not agree. Ruffian is MUCH stronger at longer time controls. Running >>against CT 15 NORMAL I play 10 games at 120/0. 1.533Ghz with ponder off each >>running 196Meg of ram using default books. > > >look. i am playing 40/120 games at 2 machines (1200 mhz) with ponder ON and >ruffian is NOT stronger than CT15. I do not think that 120/0 is blitz. I do not say that ruffian is better than tiger15 and there was not a significant result to decide. One possible problem with ponder off is that one of the engines may ponder because of a bug so I agree that ponder on is better. Another point is that the time management of one program may be better at 120/0 when the time management of another program is better at 120/40. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.