Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 07:11:39 10/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2002 at 10:05:39, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 07, 2002 at 09:39:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On October 07, 2002 at 08:48:04, Rex wrote: >> >>>I DO not agree. Ruffian is MUCH stronger at longer time controls. Running >>>against CT 15 NORMAL I play 10 games at 120/0. 1.533Ghz with ponder off each >>>running 196Meg of ram using default books. >> >> >>look. i am playing 40/120 games at 2 machines (1200 mhz) with ponder ON and >>ruffian is NOT stronger than CT15. > >I do not think that 120/0 is blitz. >I do not say that ruffian is better than tiger15 and there was not a significant >result to decide. > >One possible problem with ponder off is that one of the engines may ponder >because of a bug so I agree that ponder on is better. > >Another point is that the time management of one program may be better at 120/0 >when the time management of another program is better at 120/40. > >Uri Good argument but we know too less about such things. Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.