Author: Chessfun
Date: 07:48:36 10/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2002 at 10:29:40, Rex wrote: >On October 07, 2002 at 10:05:39, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 07, 2002 at 09:39:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On October 07, 2002 at 08:48:04, Rex wrote: >>> >>>>I DO not agree. Ruffian is MUCH stronger at longer time controls. Running >>>>against CT 15 NORMAL I play 10 games at 120/0. 1.533Ghz with ponder off each >>>>running 196Meg of ram using default books. >>> >>> >>>look. i am playing 40/120 games at 2 machines (1200 mhz) with ponder ON and >>>ruffian is NOT stronger than CT15. >> >>I do not think that 120/0 is blitz. >>I do not say that ruffian is better than tiger15 and there was not a significant >>result to decide. >> >>One possible problem with ponder off is that one of the engines may ponder >>because of a bug so I agree that ponder on is better. >> >>Another point is that the time management of one program may be better at 120/0 >>when the time management of another program is better at 120/40. >> >>Uri > >Here is a game with Ponder On against Deep Fritz 7. Computer running DF was >much faster than Ruffians. Yes its only one game but both played that one game >with equal starting times and conditions. > >White: Deep Fritz (giant-c) running on a intel 2ghz x2. Both with Ponder on. >Black: Ruffian Single 1.533Ghz > >[Event "ICC 120 2 u"] >[Site "Internet Chess Club"] >[Date "2002.10.04"] >[Round "-"] >[White "RebelRex"] >[Black "giant-c"] >[Result "1/2-1/2"] >[ICCResult "Game drawn by mutual agreement"] As you say it's one game. I've played 10 between these two engines at 40/40 and Deep Fritz 7 won +5 -0 =5 ... then again you could say that's only 10 games ;-) Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.