Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 07:54:11 10/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2002 at 10:09:14, Ed Panek wrote: >GM commentator Nigel Short was >critical of the Fritz Team's decision to resign. "At least for the thousands of >chess fans out there who will see this game and not understand why black >resigned," he said. "There are several long variations for white to calculate, >many choices to make, it's not that simple. Black should have played on for >at least 10 more moves." > > > I agree. I dont think that just because Fritz evaluations drops very low that >Fritz should resign. If the Strentgh of the computer is its ability to navigate >long lines and make no tactical mistakes, while it takes much more work for a >human to do this, and the eval is thinking according to perfect play...why not >make them sweat it out. > >Chess is war. This is the beginning of the match. Doesnt long term implications >of stress come into play? And if it irritates Kramnik...even better. > > > >Ed I cannot take Nigel Short's comments serious. When I followed the game live, the winning move Rd5+ came to my mind within seconds, and after one or two minutes of thinking time I was quite sure that the pawn ending would be lost for Black. There is no doubt - that's my opinion - that a GM would play Rd5+ in a blitz game. But of course, Kramnik wanted to be absolutely sure before playing the winning move the more so, since he could also have an easy win with Rxa5. Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.