Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 22:52:16 10/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 00:52:38, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >He also says that their Q-search is much more powerful than the one that is >usually used in the software-only programs. How can he tell? Nobody knows what the commercials are doing. >Hsu gave some details why they don't use null-move: >(1) He thinks that singular extensions and null-move gave more-or-less the same >rating difference (100-200 points IIRC). Bull. Their own reported findings directly contradict this! >(2) It's very hard to implement both null move and singular extensions in the >same program. Bull. I'm sorry, I don't believe a word of it. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.