Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Addressing frequently-discussed Deep Blue issues (from a FHH talk)

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 00:58:13 10/08/02

Go up one level in this thread

On October 07, 2002 at 21:35:23, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>Never said there was _not_ one.  I said "there was no reasonably efficient
>software implementation" that could be used in an engine."  Big difference.
>You _can_ emulate _anything_ in software, by definition.  But that doesn't
>mean you can use it to play games...

Is that what you said? What was the date? I'd like to look that thread up.

Also, it doesn't mean you can use it to play games? Then what software
simulation was Joel playing?

-Tom

• Re: Addressing frequently-discussed Deep Blue issues (from a FHH talk) Robert Hyatt 07:30:16 10/08/02
  • Re: Addressing frequently-discussed Deep Blue issues (from a FHH talk) Uri Blass 07:38:23 10/08/02
    • Re: Addressing frequently-discussed Deep Blue issues (from a FHH talk) Robert Hyatt 10:09:54 10/08/02
      • Re: Addressing frequently-discussed Deep Blue issues (from a FHH talk) Uri Blass 12:23:17 10/08/02
        • Re: Addressing frequently-discussed Deep Blue issues (from a FHH talk) Jeremiah Penery 12:36:01 10/08/02
• Re: Addressing frequently-discussed Deep Blue issues (from a FHH talk) Russell Reagan 06:34:25 10/08/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.