Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 04:39:12 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 07:29:16, Uri Blass wrote: >Novelty can be also a tactical idea that humans never considered and a computer >can find after some minutes or some hours of search. > >The idea does not have to be idea to win material but can also be an idea to win >something positional but you need to calculate a lot of plies forward in order >to find it. > >Uri Sure, that should be possible, but that computers get into that mode to be able to get a positional understanding of a position, seems improbable. Then it's more probable that chess will be solved. The point is that positional understanding depends always on complexity and entirety (German: Ganzheit). And to repeat a common saying, entirety is more than the sum of the parts. Rolf Zueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.