Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:45:12 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 07:39:12, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 07:29:16, Uri Blass wrote: > >>Novelty can be also a tactical idea that humans never considered and a computer >>can find after some minutes or some hours of search. >> >>The idea does not have to be idea to win material but can also be an idea to win >>something positional but you need to calculate a lot of plies forward in order >>to find it. >> >>Uri > >Sure, that should be possible, but that computers get into that mode to be able >to get a positional understanding of a position, seems improbable. Then it's >more probable that chess will be solved. The point is that positional >understanding depends always on complexity and entirety (German: Ganzheit). And >to repeat a common saying, entirety is more than the sum of the parts. > >Rolf Zueschen Computers have positional understanding. It is a fact that no good program use only material evaluation. It is possible that they may find a novelty to achieve positional advantage. Uri Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.