Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:06:51 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2002 at 21:46:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 07, 2002 at 10:05:27, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On October 06, 2002 at 21:21:17, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>Lack of null-move is not a known deficiency. I can name a pretty successful >>>program >>>or two (commercial) that didn't rely on it... >> >>They use other ways of forward pruning that replace nullmove. The DB >>team did nothing of that sorts. >> >>-- >>GCP > > >Based on what? we _know_ they did something. The logs clearly prove that >beyond >any doubt. And they have mentioned some sort of forward pruing in their >discussions of >the hardware chips... Yes they searched 12 ply nominal, and now and then extensions (singular and other stuff like i do too) and they used 'no progress' pruning in hardware. I am amazed that eugene says explicitly it is in the hardware done. didn't they use it in software? best regards, vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.