Author: Eddie
Date: 11:59:45 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 14:52:09, David Hanley wrote: > >It's really not that fritz has no endgame--it's that kramnik is a super-super GM >and they have the capacity to make hard things look easy. > >Sure, some wild middlegames would be "cool" but why would kramnik do that? He >wants to win the match. Perhaps after he has the match swen up, he'll allow a >wild game. > >After all, how many of US could beat fritz in a middlegame? > >dave Hi Dave, I agree with you here! And, yes some cool middle games w/queens would be great, but Kramnik, has a job to do, and beat the prog in the endgame. What bugs me, is that all over the media, they are saying Fritz is stronger then the Deep Blue prog that beat Garry K! That's a joke if you ask me. The prog that Garry played would have destroyed Fritz easily ...... lot's of great middle games in those games eh?!! Have a great day ....
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.