Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:13:58 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 16:01:59, Christophe Theron wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 12:45:41, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On October 08, 2002 at 12:38:46, Christophe Drieu wrote: >> >>>Christophe was right. >> >>right. >> >>CT15 IS stronger than CT14, only it plays less active chess. >>its more accurate. but its not weaker. >> >>in games 60/60 or 40/120 it plays very succesful against Fritz, >>Ruffian etc. >> >>on faster time controls it seems it is not so strong anymore, i guess >>others outsearch it. > > > >I don't think so. > >Almost all the fast time controls results posted involve Fischer time controls, >which are not correctly handled by Chess Tiger. > >Play X+0, any value of X, and we will talk about it again. > > If you both maybe recall Jim Walker and I both played a series of games at 5/0 autoplayed with Tiger 15. Jim then compared those results to Tiger 14 and it appeared that 15 was stronger at 5/0 Sarah. > >>only christophe knows ... why. maybe he has changed the search >>and it is not doing so much PROGRESS in times <1 minute and makes >>more progress in times >1 minute. >> >>this would explain why ruffian has a change <1' and almost NO chance when >>tiger15 >>has >1' time for computation. >> >>Maybe this time the blitz-guys or the chess-server blitz people >>learn their lesson :-)) >> >>since france championship was on FAST time control and tiger15 having >>slower machine we now SEE why tiger did not win. >> >>THIS tiger15 is weaker <1' than other tigers. i think our data can prove this. >> >>why ? >> >>we should wait what christophe says.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.