Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:43:54 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 16:40:02, Omid David wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 16:25:18, Chessfun wrote: > >>On October 08, 2002 at 16:22:07, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On October 08, 2002 at 15:52:45, Chessfun wrote: >>>>On October 08, 2002 at 15:37:16, Omid David wrote: >>>[snip] >>>>>Kasparov continues to be the highest rated chess player, and as his last year's >>>>>results show, he is far stronger than Kramnik. >>>> >>>>Based on human v human play, his record in human v comp isn't quite so >>>>impressive. >>> >>>I expect him to devote a lot of energy to change that perception. >> >>Agh if only Deep Blue were still around to teach both Kramnik and Kasparov >>another lesson. I think DB could take them both on at the same time ! either as >>a simul or a pair. >> >>Sarah. > >Substitute the word "Deep Blue" with "Fischer": > >"Agh if only Fischer were still around to teach both Kramnik and Kasparov >another lesson. I think Fischer could take them both on at the same time ! >either as a simul or a pair." > > >Deep Blue is as irrelevant today as Fischer. Agh Fischer...in his day he could also probably have given them both Knight odds ;-), maybe Deep Blue just a pawn ! Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.