Author: Omid David
Date: 13:51:17 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 16:43:54, Chessfun wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 16:40:02, Omid David wrote: > >>On October 08, 2002 at 16:25:18, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:22:07, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>On October 08, 2002 at 15:52:45, Chessfun wrote: >>>>>On October 08, 2002 at 15:37:16, Omid David wrote: >>>>[snip] >>>>>>Kasparov continues to be the highest rated chess player, and as his last year's >>>>>>results show, he is far stronger than Kramnik. >>>>> >>>>>Based on human v human play, his record in human v comp isn't quite so >>>>>impressive. >>>> >>>>I expect him to devote a lot of energy to change that perception. >>> >>>Agh if only Deep Blue were still around to teach both Kramnik and Kasparov >>>another lesson. I think DB could take them both on at the same time ! either as >>>a simul or a pair. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>Substitute the word "Deep Blue" with "Fischer": >> >>"Agh if only Fischer were still around to teach both Kramnik and Kasparov >>another lesson. I think Fischer could take them both on at the same time ! >>either as a simul or a pair." >> >> >>Deep Blue is as irrelevant today as Fischer. > > >Agh Fischer...in his day he could also probably have given them both Knight odds >;-) > Yes, but Fischer's days are behind us... so are the days of Deep Blue... >maybe Deep Blue just a pawn ! >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.