Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:52:36 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 16:48:39, Omid David wrote:
>On October 08, 2002 at 16:35:48, Ricardo R Santana wrote:
>
>>It will be nice to see if Kasparov could socre as fine as Kramnik. It's seems
>>Kramnik playing style is more than adequate to play against computers...but
>>Kasparov risky style seems dangerous against a tactical mosnter...so, wee will
>>see...
>>
>>Ricardo Sant Ana
>
>
>Kasparov will win, but won't score as good as Kramnik because:
>
>1. Kasparov's style ("fire on board"!) isn't suitable for anti-computer match
I'd suggest Kasparov can also play quite, he has in the past many times.
>2. Junior is much stronger than Fritz
Not against Fritz maybe.
>3. Junior has a better reputation for complicating the matters
I actually don't know of any program that has a "reputation for complicating the
matters".
>4. Junior has a better endgame understanding
Some evidence should be required.
>5. Kasparov won't get an exact copy before the match
>
>6. Junior hasn't lost a single game against a human in the past year! (and
> its only loss to a computer, was in Maastricht to Fritz, nevertheless it
> managed to win the tournament).
Then I guess that negates the 152 losses it's had on my Pc's.
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.