Author: Peter Berger
Date: 13:52:49 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 15:11:56, Uri Blass wrote: >I guess that even Crafty(R=3) is good enough to get 75% at 60 minutes/40 moves >against Crafty(R=0) (I think that programs that do checks in the qsearch like >Tao can get even better results). > >My guess is based on my experience with movei when my results suggest that the >latest movei earn more from time relative to the public movei when one of the >differences is that I use R=3 in the latest version when the public version is >using R=2. > >I admit that I did not do comparison of only R=2 against R=3 except test suites >when R=3 scored better. > >Uri I did some test matches with Yace recently although I am not completely sure I can interpret the results correctly using above terminology. At least for Yace there wasn't any significant difference in strength between R=2 and R=3 at all it seems. As I remember the only slight tendency was that lower R values might be better at slower time controls. I am not so familiar with this stuff, so to be exact I tested null_h=4 against default and null_l=4 against default at slower and faster time control. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.