Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:56:38 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 16:48:39, Omid David wrote:
>On October 08, 2002 at 16:35:48, Ricardo R Santana wrote:
>
>>It will be nice to see if Kasparov could socre as fine as Kramnik. It's seems
>>Kramnik playing style is more than adequate to play against computers...but
>>Kasparov risky style seems dangerous against a tactical mosnter...so, wee will
>>see...
>>
>>Ricardo Sant Ana
>
>
>Kasparov will win, but won't score as good as Kramnik because:
>
>1. Kasparov's style ("fire on board"!) isn't suitable for anti-computer match
I am not sure about it.
Kasparov beated deep thought convincingly when I remember that karpov had
problems against deep thought and could win it only after deep thought blundered
in rook endgame.
>
>2. Junior is much stronger than Fritz
I am not sure about it.
We are going to see if the next Junior can lead the ssdf list.
The number of games in world championship is not enough to be sure.
>
>3. Junior has a better reputation for complicating the matters
>
>4. Junior has a better endgame understanding
>
>5. Kasparov won't get an exact copy before the match
This is the main point.
>
>6. Junior hasn't lost a single game against a human in the past year! (and
> its only loss to a computer, was in Maastricht to Fritz, nevertheless it
> managed to win the tournament).
Junior lost against shredder and not against Fritz in Maastricht.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.