Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:59:21 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 16:52:36, Chessfun wrote:
>On October 08, 2002 at 16:48:39, Omid David wrote:
>
>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:35:48, Ricardo R Santana wrote:
>>
>>>It will be nice to see if Kasparov could socre as fine as Kramnik. It's seems
>>>Kramnik playing style is more than adequate to play against computers...but
>>>Kasparov risky style seems dangerous against a tactical mosnter...so, wee will
>>>see...
>>>
>>>Ricardo Sant Ana
>>
>>
>>Kasparov will win, but won't score as good as Kramnik because:
>>
>>1. Kasparov's style ("fire on board"!) isn't suitable for anti-computer match
>
>I'd suggest Kasparov can also play quite, he has in the past many times.
>
>>2. Junior is much stronger than Fritz
>
>Not against Fritz maybe.
>
>>3. Junior has a better reputation for complicating the matters
>
>I actually don't know of any program that has a "reputation for complicating the
>matters".
>
>>4. Junior has a better endgame understanding
>
>Some evidence should be required.
>
>>5. Kasparov won't get an exact copy before the match
>>
>>6. Junior hasn't lost a single game against a human in the past year! (and
>
>
>> its only loss to a computer, was in Maastricht to Fritz, nevertheless it
>> managed to win the tournament).
>
>Then I guess that negates the 152 losses it's had on my Pc's.
>
>Sarah.
Your games are not games of the latest Junior so
I cannot count them for this discussion.
Junior7 is weaker than Deep Fritz7 but I have no details to know if latest
Junior is better or worse than Deep Fritz7.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.