Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:00:37 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 16:59:21, Uri Blass wrote:
>On October 08, 2002 at 16:52:36, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:48:39, Omid David wrote:
>>
>>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:35:48, Ricardo R Santana wrote:
>>>
>>>>It will be nice to see if Kasparov could socre as fine as Kramnik. It's seems
>>>>Kramnik playing style is more than adequate to play against computers...but
>>>>Kasparov risky style seems dangerous against a tactical mosnter...so, wee will
>>>>see...
>>>>
>>>>Ricardo Sant Ana
>>>
>>>
>>>Kasparov will win, but won't score as good as Kramnik because:
>>>
>>>1. Kasparov's style ("fire on board"!) isn't suitable for anti-computer match
>>
>>I'd suggest Kasparov can also play quite, he has in the past many times.
>>
>>>2. Junior is much stronger than Fritz
>>
>>Not against Fritz maybe.
>>
>>>3. Junior has a better reputation for complicating the matters
>>
>>I actually don't know of any program that has a "reputation for complicating the
>>matters".
>>
>>>4. Junior has a better endgame understanding
>>
>>Some evidence should be required.
>>
>>>5. Kasparov won't get an exact copy before the match
>>>
>>>6. Junior hasn't lost a single game against a human in the past year! (and
>>
>>
>>> its only loss to a computer, was in Maastricht to Fritz, nevertheless it
>>> managed to win the tournament).
>>
>>Then I guess that negates the 152 losses it's had on my Pc's.
>>
>>Sarah.
>
>Your games are not games of the latest Junior so
>I cannot count them for this discussion.
Actually I'm not sure there is anything at all to count on in this discussion.
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.