Author: Omid David
Date: 14:06:15 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 16:56:38, Uri Blass wrote:
>On October 08, 2002 at 16:48:39, Omid David wrote:
>
>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:35:48, Ricardo R Santana wrote:
>>
>>>It will be nice to see if Kasparov could socre as fine as Kramnik. It's seems
>>>Kramnik playing style is more than adequate to play against computers...but
>>>Kasparov risky style seems dangerous against a tactical mosnter...so, wee will
>>>see...
>>>
>>>Ricardo Sant Ana
>>
>>
>>Kasparov will win, but won't score as good as Kramnik because:
>>
>>1. Kasparov's style ("fire on board"!) isn't suitable for anti-computer match
>
>I am not sure about it.
>Kasparov beated deep thought convincingly when I remember that karpov had
>problems against deep thought and could win it only after deep thought blundered
>in rook endgame.
>
>>
>>2. Junior is much stronger than Fritz
>
>I am not sure about it.
>We are going to see if the next Junior can lead the ssdf list.
>The number of games in world championship is not enough to be sure.
>
>>
>>3. Junior has a better reputation for complicating the matters
>>
>>4. Junior has a better endgame understanding
>>
>>5. Kasparov won't get an exact copy before the match
>
>This is the main point.
>
>>
>>6. Junior hasn't lost a single game against a human in the past year! (and
>> its only loss to a computer, was in Maastricht to Fritz, nevertheless it
>> managed to win the tournament).
>
>Junior lost against shredder and not against Fritz in Maastricht.
Sorry, my typo! Thought about Shredder but somehow typed Fritz!
>
>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.