Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 14:08:16 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 13:26:06, Kurt Widmann wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 12:38:34, Knut Bjørnar Wålberg wrote: > >>If Kramnik mops the floor with Deep Fritz, a rather odd situation might arise: >>What will most strengthen the belief that the top human(s) is in fact better >>than any machine/program ever created? >> >>That Kasparov later crushes Deep Junior, or that he loses? >> >>If Kasparov wins without problems, it could be argued that the Chessbase >>products are clearly not up to the standard of Deep Blue. However, if Kasparov >>loses, then DF and DJ should at least be on par with DB2, and therefore Kramnik >>is even stronger, and it's just Kasparov that doesn't know how to play >>computers. >> >>I know there are other factors that come into play (especially the way the >>players were able to prepare), but how do you all think the world in general >>will perceive these different scenarios? What is the ideal score in the two >>matches when it comes to creating interest in chess and computer chess? >> >>As a final note, it seems to me that Deep Blue might end up as a sort of Bobby >>Fischer of computer chess; Perceived by many as the greatest ever, a statement >>that one can neither prove nor disprove at the moment. Any comments on that? ;) >> >>Knut Bjørnar Wålberg > >Could it just be,that the silicons are guided by carbons into positions >where brute force calculations does not yet reach the horizon set by >strategic planning. Example,F7 in todays game against Kramnik at move 13 >seem to play at a plateau of 1200 rated humans(carbons). But carbon based >programmers must not guide Silicons into such positions without giving them >more knowledge of how to proceed. In the above mentioned game it is unfair >to assume that F7 will find a way to keep or increase its position evaluation >from move 13 on. It needed at least an other 4 or 5 moves for proper guidance. >So,Kramnik made mince meat out of the book makers and Kasparov may do the same. >Kurt Widmann By the way, congratulations on this: http://correspondencechess.com/ccca/k41.htm !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.