Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 14:51:03 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 14:52:09, David Hanley wrote: > >It's really not that fritz has no endgame--it's that kramnik is a super-super GM >and they have the capacity to make hard things look easy. > >Sure, some wild middlegames would be "cool" but why would kramnik do that? He >wants to win the match. Perhaps after he has the match swen up, he'll allow a >wild game. > I hope Kramnik plays as if he were being paid for every win, not just for winning the match. Of the latter there is little doubt. But to see him score 4 or 5 wins would wake the world up a little about the real strength of the top GMs versus today's programs running on PCs. I guess we'll see whether Kramnik coasts from here on or whether he keeps up the pressure. >After all, how many of US could beat fritz in a middlegame? > >dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.