Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Apologize, "Peter Berger" Computer chess & Fairy tales about *Chess*

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 15:11:13 10/08/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 08, 2002 at 17:31:43, Peter Berger wrote:

>On October 08, 2002 at 17:26:15, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote:
>
>>>Uri gave one good answer to your question already IMHO.
>>
>>:)
>>Me: Kramnik was out of book after 12...Bf8
>>Uri: No, he had just not study at the position after 12...Bf8.
>>
>>Should I really answer such argument?
>
>You win, satisfied? Although it could be mentioned that you simply made up the
>"Uri" part here .

I never read such insulting nonsense here in CCC. You already wrote in a very
arrogant way on my explanations of the Monty Hall Dilemma. Then at times you
pretend to be just a newbie and now you dare to insult this man who just gave
you his good arguments? How mean!

And where did you learn that a discussion is made to "win"? How stupid!

I give you the quote here and hope that you will apologize:

"It is still possible that the position after Bf8 was planned but kramnik had no
time to analyze it and only guessed that if Fritz plays that move he is going to
beat it and it is better to use time to prepare for other lines.
Uri"

Now satisfied? Know what? Your name is not Peter Berger. No way. You're a bit
too saucy for being a newcomer. Just that little bit... But here I caught you in
a little character assassination! So I simply tell you "Behave yourself!" And I
find it more appropriate that I'm not involved here but I want to show a bit of
civil courage.

Rolf Tueschen

>
>>Where do you think he was out of book?
>>
>I explained this in my previous post.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.