Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 15:14:13 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 17:53:34, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 08, 2002 at 17:31:53, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On October 08, 2002 at 17:15:24, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:59:40, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:09:30, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>That's obvious. >>>>> >>>>>My congratualtions to ChessBase. They have done an excellent job for their baby, >>>>>and also an excellent job for computer chess in general. >>>>> >>>>>This is not humour, I *really* mean it. >>>>> >>>>>Life is not a zero-sum game. In real life, you can achieve a great victory even >>>>>if your opponent wins. >>>>> >>>>>That's exactly what's happening here. Kramnik wins. Fritz wins. Computer chess >>>>>wins! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Christophe >>>> >>>>Absolutely! >>>> >>>>Terry >>> >>>Besides Kasparov how many players would have score 1/2 against Kasparov so far? >>> >>>NOT TOO MANY. I would almost bet you that Deep Fritz right now can beat all the >>>other players besides Kramnik Kasparov and Anand in a 8 games match. >>> >>>Pichard. >> >> >>I think differently. I think there are at least 50 GMs who could win such a >>match (40 moves in 2 hours and games at most every other day). Certainly the >>ones you mentioned but also Karpov comes to mind as a sure winner. The main >>issue is for the human to purposely avoid complications. > >Without giving the program in advance I strongly doubt that any other player >besides these three could beat Deep Frit right now. > >Pichard. Simple. Those three are only a few rating points ahead of 3 more, who are only a few rating points ahead of 10 more.... All of them are stronger than Deep Fritz, once they learn how to play a computer.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.