Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 15:40:17 10/08/02
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2002 at 17:33:50, Jorge wrote:
>On October 08, 2002 at 15:45:26, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>On October 08, 2002 at 04:05:59, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>>
>>>On October 07, 2002 at 22:16:08, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>>
>>>>To post such unpopular results? :-)
>>>
>>>That are good and bad results. Exaggerated results and otherwise. Supporters and
>>>opposition, the same as any other engine. Adding petty remarks of this nature
>>>just adds to the moronity of the discussion.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Mogens
>>
>>
>>
>>And your -as usual- patronizing remark is supposed to fix that moronity?
>>
>>Still nothing interesting to say about computer chess?
>>
>>
>>
>> Christophe
>
>Christopher what do you think about Ruffian? I don't have Winboard, but I do
>have CT15. I know that Ruffian is strong, we have heard plenty of it here, but
>it is astonishing to see that some people actually think that Ruffian is
>stronger than CT15-
I would not have said no without some data, but it is now clear (I think) that
it is not the case.
But some people would like it to be true, so they draw conclusions too quickly.
> at either Blitz or longer time control. By the way, I
>believe Tiger is a phenomenal blitz player.
I never win against it. :)
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.