Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Ok, after 3 game Kramnik 2,5 x 05,. But Kasparov...

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 16:12:22 10/08/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 08, 2002 at 17:37:26, martin fierz wrote:

>On October 08, 2002 at 16:48:39, Omid David wrote:
>
>>On October 08, 2002 at 16:35:48, Ricardo R Santana wrote:
>>
>>>It will be nice to see if Kasparov could socre as fine as Kramnik. It's seems
>>>Kramnik playing style is more than adequate to play against computers...but
>>>Kasparov risky style seems dangerous against a tactical mosnter...so, wee will
>>>see...
>>>
>>>Ricardo Sant Ana
>>
>>
>>Kasparov will win, but won't score as good as Kramnik because:
>
>i think you are right, but...
>
>>1. Kasparov's style ("fire on board"!) isn't suitable for anti-computer match
>mainly for this reason.
>
>>2. Junior is much stronger than Fritz
>
>huh? that's just your gut feeling. where is the proof? not in the qualifier
>tournament for this match, and not in the SSDF list for sure.
>

I think country of origin may preclude objectivity here.  I think Junior 7 is
quite strong but Deep Fritz 7 is stronger by a good 30-50 Elo on similar
hardware.


>>3. Junior has a better reputation for complicating the matters
>>
>>4. Junior has a better endgame understanding
>like in this rook endgame test you mean?
>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?256313
>:-)

Great refutation!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.